<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aging Ink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agingink.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agingink.com</link>
	<description>A writer&#039;s notebook.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>On the Reading of Books</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/on-the-reading-of-books/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/on-the-reading-of-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a book meme going around Facebook again, which I&#8217;ve seen there and on the Writers&#8217; Collective website. It runs thusly:
Have you read more than 6 of these books? The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books listed here. Instructions:
• Copy this into your NOTES to respond on Facebook.
• [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-146" href="http://agingink.com/2010/on-the-reading-of-books/archivum__old_library_/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-146" title="archivum__old_library_" src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/11/archivum__old_library_.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>There&#8217;s a book meme going around Facebook again, which I&#8217;ve seen there and <a href="http://thewriterscollective.org/2010/11/consider-yourself-tagged/">on the Writers&#8217; Collective website</a>. It runs thusly:</p>
<blockquote><p>Have you read more than 6 of these books? The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books listed here. Instructions:<br />
• Copy this into your NOTES to respond on Facebook.<br />
• Bold those books you’ve read in their entirety.<br />
• Italicize the ones you started but didn’t finish or read only an excerpt.</p></blockquote>
<p>Older versions of the meme differ slightly, and include the instructions</p>
<blockquote><p>Add a &#8216;+&#8217; to the ones you LOVE.<br />
Star (*) those you plan on reading.</p></blockquote>
<p>So I did that too, but change &#8220;LOVE&#8221; to &#8221; particularly enjoyed&#8221;. My list (below) shows &#8220;[M]&#8221; after the ones where I&#8217;ve seen the movie or stage production.<br />
1 Pride and Prejudice – Jane Austen<strong> </strong>[M]<br />
<strong> 2 The Lord of the Rings – JRR Tolkien</strong> [M] +<br />
3 Jane Eyre – Charlotte Bronte<br />
<strong> 4 Harry Potter series – JK Rowling</strong> [M] +<br />
5 To Kill a Mockingbird – Harper Lee *<br />
<strong>6 The Bible</strong><br />
7 Wuthering Heights – Emily Bronte<br />
<strong>8 Nineteen Eighty Four – George Orwell</strong> [M]<br />
9 His Dark Materials – Philip Pullman<br />
10 Great Expectations – Charles Dickens<br />
11 Little Women – Louisa M Alcott<br />
<strong>12 Tess of the D’Urbervilles – Thomas Hardy</strong> [M]<br />
13 Catch 22 – Joseph Heller<br />
<em>14 Complete Works of Shakespeare</em><br />
15 Rebecca – Daphne Du Maurier<br />
<strong> 16 The Hobbit – JRR Tolkien</strong> +<br />
17 Birdsong – Sebastian Faulk<br />
18 Catcher in the Rye – JD Salinger *<br />
19 The Time Traveler’s Wife – Audrey Niffenegger [M]<br />
20 Middlemarch – George Eliot<br />
21 Gone With The Wind – Margaret Mitchell [M]<br />
22 The Great Gatsby – F Scott Fitzgerald<br />
24 War and Peace – Leo Tolstoy<br />
<em> 25 The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – Douglas Adams</em><br />
27 Crime and Punishment – Fyodor Dostoyevsky<br />
28 Grapes of Wrath – John Steinbeck *<br />
29 Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland – Lewis Carroll [M]<br />
30 The Wind in the Willows – Kenneth Grahame<br />
31 Anna Karenina – Leo Tolstoy<br />
32 David Copperfield – Charles Dickens<br />
<strong>33 Chronicles of Narnia – CS Lewis</strong> +<br />
34 Emma -Jane Austen<strong> </strong>[M]<br />
35 Persuasion – Jane Austen<br />
<strong>36 The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe – CS Lewis</strong> [M]<br />
37 The Kite Runner – Khaled Hosseini<br />
38 Captain Corelli’s Mandolin – Louis De Bernieres [M]<br />
39 Memoirs of a Geisha – Arthur Golden<br />
<em>40 Winnie the Pooh – A.A. Milne</em><strong> </strong>[M]<br />
<strong> 41 Animal Farm – George Orwell</strong><strong> </strong>[M] +<br />
<strong>42 The Da Vinci Code – Dan Brown </strong>[M]<br />
43 One Hundred Years of Solitude – Gabriel Garcia Marquez<br />
44 A Prayer for Owen Meaney – John Irving<br />
45 The Woman in White – Wilkie Collins<br />
46 Anne of Green Gables – LM Montgomery<br />
47 Far From The Madding Crowd – Thomas Hardy<br />
48 The Handmaid’s Tale – Margaret Atwood [M]<br />
<strong>49 Lord of the Flies – William Golding</strong><br />
50 Atonement – Ian McEwan [M]<br />
<strong>51 Life of Pi – Yann Martel</strong> +<br />
52 Dune – Frank Herbert [M]<br />
53 Cold Comfort Farm – Stella Gibbons<br />
54 Sense and Sensibility – Jane Austen<br />
55 A Suitable Boy – Vikram Seth<br />
56 The Shadow of the Wind – Carlos Ruiz Zafon<br />
<em>57 A Tale Of Two Cities – Charles Dickens</em> *<br />
<em> 58 Brave New World – Aldous Huxley</em><br />
59 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time – Mark Addon *<br />
60 Love In The Time Of Cholera – Gabriel Garcia Marquez<br />
<strong>61 Of Mice and Men – John Steinbeck</strong><br />
62 Lolita – Vladimir Nabokov<br />
63 The Secret History – Donna Tartt<br />
64 The Lovely Bones – Alice Sebold<br />
<em>65 Count of Monte Cristo – Alexandre Dumas</em> [M] *<br />
<em>66 On The Road – Jack Kerouac *</em><br />
67 Jude the Obscure – Thomas Hardy<br />
68 Bridget Jones’s Diary – Helen Fielding<br />
69 Midnight’s Children – Salman Rushdie<br />
<em>70 Moby Dick – Herman Melville</em><br />
71 Oliver Twist – Charles Dickens [M]<br />
72 Dracula – Bram Stoker [M]<br />
73 The Secret Garden – Frances Hodgson Burnett<br />
74 Notes From A Small Island – Bill Bryson<br />
75 Ulysses – James Joyce<br />
76 The Inferno – Dante<br />
77 Swallows and Amazons – Arthur Ransome<br />
78 Germinal – Emile Zola<br />
79 Vanity Fair – William Makepeace Thackeray<br />
80 Possession – AS Byatt<br />
<em>81 A Christmas Carol – Charles Dickens</em> [M] *<br />
82 Cloud Atlas – David Mitchell<br />
<strong>83 The Color Purple – Alice Walker</strong> [M]<br />
84 The Remains of the Day – Kazuo Ishiguro [M]<br />
85 Madame Bovary – Gustave Flaubert<br />
86 A Fine Balance – Rohinton Mistry<br />
<strong>87 Charlotte’s Web – E.B. White</strong><br />
<strong>88 The Five People You Meet In Heaven – Mitch Albom</strong> [M] +<br />
<strong> 89 Adventures of Sherlock Holmes – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle</strong> [M] +<br />
90 The Faraway Tree Collection – Enid Blyton<br />
91 Heart of Darkness – Joseph Conrad<br />
<strong>92 The Little Prince – Antoine De Saint-Exupery</strong><br />
93 The Wasp Factory – Iain Banks<br />
94 Watership Down – Richard Adams [M]<br />
95 A Confederacy of Dunces – John Kennedy Toole<br />
96 A Town Like Alice – Nevil Shute<br />
97 The Three Musketeers – Alexandre Dumas [M] *<br />
<strong>98 Hamlet – William Shakespeare</strong> [M]<br />
99 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory – Roald Dahl [M]<br />
100 Les Miserables – Victor Hugo [M]</p>
<p>Okay, only 28, but I can add another 12 if I can include movie and stage productions&#8230; which is cheating, I know. And I admit it, I never finished <em>Hitchiker&#8217;s Guide to the Galaxy.</em> Yes, it&#8217;s really quite sad. And I&#8217;ve not yet read <em>Catcher in the Rye</em>, but it&#8217;s on my shelf and I mean to read it soon. Really. And I suppose I should say I enjoyed the Bible, and I <em>did</em> enjoy some parts&#8230; but to be honest, I didn&#8217;t necessarily enjoy <em>all</em> of it.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s with some of the items on this list, anyway? I mean, <em>The Da Vinci Code</em>? <a href="http://thewriterscollective.org/2010/11/consider-yourself-tagged/">Like Kate said</a>, seriously?. I want to replace that with Mitch Albom&#8217;s <em>Tuesdays with Morrie</em>, which I&#8217;ve read and thought it just as good as <em>The Five People You Meet in Heaven</em>. And did the list&#8217;s creator not know that <em>The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe</em> is part of C.S. Lewis&#8217; <em>Narnia Chronicles</em>? Or that <em>Hamlet</em> is part of Shakespeare&#8217;s <em>Complete Works</em>? What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
<p>What about <em>The Diary of Anne Frank</em> or Kurt Vonnegut&#8217;s <em>Slaughterhouse Five</em>, neither of which I&#8217;ve finished, but have started and seen the movies &#8212; was even part of a stage production of <em>Anne Frank</em>, so at least I&#8217;ve read the play. And although the list has some sci-fi and fantasy, it isn&#8217;t much for classical mystery&#8230; it could use some Agatha Christie, like <em>Ten Little Indians</em> (aka <em>And Then There Were None</em>), <em>The Mousetrap</em>, or my personal favorite, <em>The Murder of Roger Ackroyd</em>. And we should include Mario Puzo&#8217;s <em>The Godfather</em>, which I can vouch for as being even better than the movie.</p>
<p>And oh, I think the list may be weighted toward women. I count at least  16 of these titles which are generally considered romance or otherwise  classics for women or girls, excluding <em>Alice in Wonderland</em>, but including the likes of <em>Little Women</em>. And then there&#8217;s <em>Bridget Jones&#8217; Diary</em>, which, well&#8230; you see my point. So <a title="Consider Yourself TAGGED" href="http://thewriterscollective.org/2010/11/consider-yourself-tagged/">Kate scored 51</a> and <a title="Hilary Friesen (Facebook Note)" href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=66755160209">Hilary scored 46</a>. Hilary&#8217;s meme list included George Orwell&#8217;s <em>1984</em>, which I <em>have</em> read. Score another one for me. It looks like I&#8217;ve really got to stretch the rules just to crack into the 40&#8217;s, so I give up. I&#8217;ll just have to read more.</p>
<p>For the record, the fact that the  list varies and contains  duplicates makes me question the veracity of  the BBC as the source. And <a title="How Do Memes Start? A Case Study: 100 Books in Facebook" href="http://www.purplecar.net/2009/03/how-do-memes-start-a-case-study-100-books-in-facebook/">I&#8217;m not the only</a><a title="BBC 100 book meme - or is it?" href="http://kriswager.blogspot.com/2009/02/bbc-100-book-meme-or-is-it.html"> one to say it</a>, either. Indications are that the list was adapted from <a title="The Big Read" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml">BBC&#8217;s The Big Read</a> list from 2003, which is based strictly on popularity (and where three entries for <em>Harry Potter</em> reflect the fact that the series was not then complete). The meme list makes 37 changes to include more of &#8220;the classics&#8221; and more American (and Canadian) titles. There is no actual claim whatsoever by the BBC that people will have read less than six of these novels, but the claim is evidently brash enough to make people grab the list and prove them wrong and say, &#8220;Humph! We look down our collective noses at you, BBC! Take that!&#8221; But no, it&#8217;s just a baseless meme.</p>
<p>Hey, if you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em, debunk &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/on-the-reading-of-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mark of a Civilized Society</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/the-mark-of-a-civilized-society/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/the-mark-of-a-civilized-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pens & Stationery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I really must lament the fact that Winnipeg doesn&#8217;t have anyplace to buy a decent pen. In Vancouver, this must represent mecca for pen-o-philes. A visit here was followed up with one to Paper~Ya on Granville Island, where I was pleased to find some Field Notes brand notebooks &#8212; yet another thing that can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onClick="popWin(this.href);return false" class="noeffect" href="http://agingink.com/files/2010/08/vps_600x800.jpg"><img src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/08/vps_600x800-300x225.jpg" alt="" title="Click = Embiggen" width="300" height="225" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-129" /></a> I really must lament the fact that Winnipeg doesn&#8217;t have anyplace to buy a decent pen. In Vancouver, this must represent mecca for pen-o-philes. A visit here was followed up with one to <a href="http://paperya.ca/" title="PaperYa">Paper~Ya</a> on <a href="http://www.granvilleisland.com/" title="Granville Island">Granville Island</a>, where I was pleased to find some <a href="http://fieldnotesbrand.com/" title="I'm not writing it down to remember later. I'm writing it down to remember it now.">Field Notes brand</a> notebooks &#8212; yet another thing that can&#8217;t be found in Winnipeg. Add in some Montblanc blue-black ink to go with my new <a href="http://www.lamy.com/eng/b2c/safari/017" title="Lamy Pens">Lamy Safari</a> fountain pen with extra-fine nib, and I&#8217;m set. For a little while, at least.</p>
<p><a onClick="popWin(this.href);return false" class="noeffect" href="http://agingink.com/files/2010/08/lamy-safari.jpg"><img src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/08/lamy-safari-e1282237165846.jpg" alt="" title="Click = Embiggen" width="500" height="112" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-130" style="float:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/the-mark-of-a-civilized-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaret Atwood, Me &amp; Stephen King</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/margaret-atwood-me-stephen-king/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/margaret-atwood-me-stephen-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I write like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Atwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I follow a number of authors and writers on Twitter, and today when I saw Margaret Atwood tweet that she writes like Stephen King, I was intrigued. Apparently an online tool can analyze a few paragraphs of your writing and tell you which author&#8217;s style yours most resembles. And I had to know. So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/07/grain-of-salt-150x120.jpg" alt="Grain of Salt" title="grain-of-salt" width="150" height="120" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-123" /> I follow a number of authors and writers on Twitter, and today when I saw <a href="http://twitter.com/MargaretAtwood/status/18463485898" title="According to the I Write Like analysis, I write like...">Margaret Atwood tweet</a> that she writes like Stephen King, I was intrigued. Apparently an online tool can analyze a few paragraphs of your writing and tell you which author&#8217;s style yours most resembles. And <strong>I had to know</strong>. So it was that I discovered,</p>
<div style="margin: 5px auto;overflow:auto;border:2px solid #ddd;font:20px/1.2 Arial,sans-serif;width:300px;padding:5px; background:#F7F7F7; color:#555"><img src="http://s.iwl.me/w.png" style="float:right" width="120">
<div style="padding:20px; border-bottom:1px solid #eee; text-shadow:#fff 0 1px"> I write like<br /><span style="font-size:30px; color:#698B22">Stephen King</span></div>
<p style="font-size:11px; text-align:center; color:#888"><em>I Write Like</em> by Mémoires, <a href="http://www.codingrobots.com/memoires/" style="color:#888">Mac journal software</a>. <a href="http://iwl.me" style="color:#333; background:#FFFFE0"><b>Analyze your writing!</b></a></p>
</div>
<p>Huzzah! That analysis is based on an excerpt from my unfinished novel, which according to the wisdom of some random autodrones, seems to be written at the same level as a couple of award-winning authors. Nice. As for <a href="http://toderash.net/2010/07/the-key-question-in-a-job-interview/" title="The Key Question in a Job Interview">my latest blog post</a>, it turns out that</p>
<div style="margin: 5px auto;overflow:auto;border:2px solid #ddd;font:20px/1.2 Arial,sans-serif;width:300px;padding:5px; background:#F7F7F7; color:#555"><img src="http://s.iwl.me/w.png" style="float:right" width="120">
<div style="padding:20px; border-bottom:1px solid #eee; text-shadow:#fff 0 1px"> I write like<br /><span style="font-size:30px; color:#698B22">H. P. Lovecraft</span></div>
<p style="font-size:11px; text-align:center; color:#888"><em>I Write Like</em> by Mémoires, <a href="http://www.codingrobots.com/memoires/" style="color:#888">Mac journal software</a>. <a href="http://iwl.me" style="color:#333; background:#FFFFE0"><b>Analyze your writing!</b></a></p>
</div>
<p>Now, not really being a horror reader or writer, I wasn&#8217;t that familiar with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._P._Lovecraft" title="Wikipedia: H. P. Lovecraft">H. P. Lovecraft</a>, so I did a quick lookup. Turns out, <a href="http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/lovecraf.htm" title="H(oward) P(hillips) Lovecraft (1890-1937)">Lovecraft is considered</a> a cult figure and &#8220;a true successor of Edgar Allan Poe.&#8221; Not only that,</p>
<blockquote><p>Although Lovecraft&#8217;s readership was limited during his life, his reputation has grown over the decades, and he is now regarded as one of the most influential horror writers of the 20<sup>th</sup> century. According to Joyce Carol Oates, Lovecraft &#8212; as with Edgar Allan Poe in the 19<sup>th</sup> century &#8212; has exerted &#8220;an incalculable influence on succeeding generations of writers of horror fiction&#8221;. Stephen King called Lovecraft &#8220;the twentieth century&#8217;s greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t decide if it&#8217;s good to be compared to such an imposing personage, or if it&#8217;s bad to be compared to someone who wasn&#8217;t very widely read in his own lifetime. Or if altogether this means that I should be switching things up and starting to write horror. Well, at least I didn&#8217;t get <a href="/2009/dan-browns-20-worst-sentences/" title="Dan Brown's 20 Worst Sentences">Dan Brown</a>. That would really depress me.</p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d try something from this blog, but the only post I have here that&#8217;s really long enough is <a href="/2008/down-at-the-crossroads/" title="Down at the Crossroads">Down at the Crossroads</a>, a post I did two years ago simply to capture some rough notes about an experience we had on the Blues Highway in the Mississippi Delta. And wouldn&#8217;t you know it,</p>
<div style="margin: 5px auto;overflow:auto;border:2px solid #ddd;font:20px/1.2 Arial,sans-serif;width:300px;padding:5px; background:#F7F7F7; color:#555"><img src="http://s.iwl.me/w.png" style="float:right" width="120">
<div style="padding:20px; border-bottom:1px solid #eee; text-shadow:#fff 0 1px"> I write like<br /><span style="font-size:30px; color:#698B22">Dan Brown</span></div>
<p style="font-size:11px; text-align:center; color:#888"><em>I Write Like</em> by Mémoires, <a href="http://www.codingrobots.com/memoires/" style="color:#888">Mac journal software</a>. <a href="http://iwl.me" style="color:#333; background:#FFFFE0"><b>Analyze your writing!</b></a></p>
</div>
<p>Almost makes me want to give up the craft, but then I reasoned that this post represents rough notes with very little or no editing done on it&#8230; not something I&#8217;d consider publishable. In fact, except for <a href="http://toderash.net/2009/03/job-interview-presentation-sprucing-up-or-deception/" title="Job Interview Presentation: Sprucing Up or Deception?">this one</a>, which came up as (-ahem!-) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Palahniuk" title="Chuck Palahniuk">Chuck Palahniuk</a>, several of my unedited stream-of-consciousness blog posts came up as Dan Brown. And in that context, everything made sense again. And besides, </p>
<div style="margin: 5px auto;overflow:auto;border:2px solid #ddd;font:20px/1.2 Arial,sans-serif;width:300px;padding:5px; background:#F7F7F7; color:#555"><img src="http://s.iwl.me/w.png" style="float:right" width="120">
<div style="padding:20px; border-bottom:1px solid #eee; text-shadow:#fff 0 1px"> I write like<br /><span style="font-size:30px; color:#698B22">Margaret Atwood</span></div>
<p style="font-size:11px; text-align:center; color:#888"><em>I Write Like</em> by Mémoires, <a href="http://www.codingrobots.com/memoires/" style="color:#888">Mac journal software</a>. <a href="http://iwl.me" style="color:#333; background:#FFFFE0"><b>Analyze your writing!</b></a></p>
</div>
<p>&#8230;which made me wonder why Margaret Atwood apparently doesn&#8217;t write like Margaret Atwood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/margaret-atwood-me-stephen-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writer&#8217;s Toolbox: Composing Thesauri</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/writers-toolbox-composing-thesauri/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/writers-toolbox-composing-thesauri/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 03:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing Tools & Exercises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Ackerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;ve taken notice of something that Angela Ackerman does on her blog, The Bookshelf Muse. She&#8217;s come up with a set of thesauri for emotions, colours, textures, shapes, symbolism, and settings, and she adds to them periodically. Recently she posted Setting Thesaurus Entry: Courtroom, and As I thought about her process, it seemed to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://agingink.com/files/2010/07/fountain-pen-notebook.jpg" class="noeffect" onClick="popWin(this.href);return false"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-116" title="fountain-pen-notebook" src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/07/fountain-pen-notebook-150x109.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="109" /></a> I&#8217;ve taken notice of something that Angela Ackerman does on her blog, <a title="Angela Ackerman's Blog" href="http://thebookshelfmuse.blogspot.com/">The Bookshelf Muse</a>. She&#8217;s come up with a set of thesauri for emotions, colours, textures, shapes, symbolism, and settings, and she adds to them periodically. Recently she posted <a href="http://thebookshelfmuse.blogspot.com/2010/07/setting-thesaurus-entry-courtroom.html">Setting Thesaurus Entry: Courtroom</a>, and As I thought about her process, it seemed to make good sense.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;m writing, I can tend to be too focused on the action and advancing the plot (which isn&#8217;t a bad thing!) but <em>too</em> much can leave the finished scene feeling a little sterile, needing deeper investment in descriptives. This is where a thesaurus like Angela&#8217;s could be helpful.</p>
<p>In my current writing project, there are a number of scenes inside several different diners where I&#8217;ve set some conversation as the characters in this particular road story stop for a bite to eat. Strictly speaking, I need them to sit down, order and eat their burgers (or whatever), have their bit of conversation and move on. I&#8217;m typically not focused on the setting of the diner as much as I could be, describing some of the sights, sounds, and smells they find there. These meal stops on the road trip are intended to stop the action just for a bit, so adding more description here would really help not only the scene, but set the right pace for these parts of the novel.</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;m in the process of editing some of these scenes now, I think I&#8217;ll take a page from Angela&#8217;s book and sit down to brainstorm some words and phrases to describe some of these settings. That way as I edit or write new scenes, I&#8217;ll have a ready source of descriptors to use. Then of course, there&#8217;s her <a href="http://thebookshelfmuse.blogspot.com/2009/08/setting-thesaurus-entry-diner_29.html" title="Setting Thesaurus Entry: Diner">thesaurus entry for &#8216;diner&#8217;</a> as well.</p>
<p>Take a look at the sidebar on <a title="The Bookshelf Muse" href="http://thebookshelfmuse.blogspot.com/">Angela Ackerman&#8217;s blog</a>, and you see a long list of these thesaurus entries, covering a wide variety of emotions and settings. Each category list starts with a definition of what that particular thesaurus <em>is</em>, like the one for the <a href="http://thebookshelfmuse.blogspot.com/2008/08/introducing-sensory-saturdaymeet-our.html" title="Introducing Sensory Saturday…Meet Our New Thesaurus!">setting thesaurus</a>. Her list was clearly a lot of work to compile, but it now represents an invaluable resource in the midst of a writing project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/writers-toolbox-composing-thesauri/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a Book Publisher Failed to Get J.D. Salinger&#8217;s Final Book &#8216;Hapworth 16, 1924&#8242; Into Print</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/how-a-book-publisher-failed-to-get-j-d-salingers-final-book-hapworth-16-1924-into-print/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/how-a-book-publisher-failed-to-get-j-d-salingers-final-book-hapworth-16-1924-into-print/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The first letter I got from J.D. Salinger was very short. It was 1988, and I had written to him with a proposal: I wanted my tiny publishing house, Orchises Press, to publish his novella Hapworth 16, 1924. And Salinger himself had improbably replied, saying that he would consider it.
Read: How a Book Publisher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><img src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/04/jd_salinger_1988-150x110.jpg" alt="J.D. Salinger in 1988" title="J.D. Salinger in 1988" width="150" height="110" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-107" /> The first letter I got from J.D. Salinger was very short. It was 1988, and I had written to him with a proposal: I wanted my tiny publishing house, Orchises Press, to publish his novella <em>Hapworth 16, 1924</em>. And Salinger himself had improbably replied, saying that he would consider it.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Read:</strong> <a href="http://nymag.com/arts/books/features/65210/">How a Book Publisher Failed to Get J.D. Salinger&#8217;s Final Book &#8216;<em>Hapworth 16, 1924</em>&#8216; Into Print &#8212; <em>New York Magazine</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/how-a-book-publisher-failed-to-get-j-d-salingers-final-book-hapworth-16-1924-into-print/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word Count for Novels and Children&#8217;s Books</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/word-count-for-novels-and-childrens-books/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/word-count-for-novels-and-childrens-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel length]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The apparently definitive post on Word Count for Novels and Children&#8217;s Books from Chuck Sambuchino. A good guide for those following the sage advice of not expecting to be the exception.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The apparently definitive post on <a href="http://www.guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog/Word+Count+For+Novels+And+Childrens+Books+The+Definitive+Post.aspx">Word Count for Novels and Children&#8217;s Books</a> from Chuck Sambuchino. A good guide for those following the sage advice of not expecting to be the exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/word-count-for-novels-and-childrens-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Famous Literary Drunks &amp; Addicts</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/famous-literary-drunks-addicts/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/famous-literary-drunks-addicts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIFE Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substance abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Writing Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a variety of strategies for literary success, but this photo-essay might stimulate some unhealthy ones: Famous Literary Drunks &#38; Addicts &#8212; LIFE.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a variety of strategies for literary success, but this photo-essay might stimulate some unhealthy ones: <a href="http://www.life.com/image/ugc1029602/in-gallery/38742/famous-literary-drunks--addicts">Famous Literary Drunks &amp; Addicts &#8212; <em>LIFE</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/famous-literary-drunks-addicts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writing sans Solitude</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/writing-sans-solitude/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/writing-sans-solitude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beat writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c.s. lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.r.r. tolkein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack kerouac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Writer As Social Butterfly &#8212; good post at LitDrift on the value to writers of interacting with others, despite writing being thought of as a solitary task.
It should be obvious that writers, writing about society, would make it a point to immerse themselves in that society. But writers are artists, and like most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="noeffect" href="http://agingink.com/files/2010/01/beatgeneration.jpg" onClick="popWin(this.href);return false"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-82" src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/01/beatgeneration-150x137.jpg" alt="beatgeneration" title="beatgeneration" width="150" height="137" /></a> <a href="http://www.litdrift.com/2010/01/15/writer-as-social-butterfly/">The Writer As Social Butterfly</a> &#8212; good post at <a title="LitDrift.com" href="http://www.litdrift.com">LitDrift</a> on the value to writers of interacting with others, despite writing being thought of as a solitary task.</p>
<blockquote><p>It should be obvious that writers, writing about society, would make it a point to immerse themselves in that society. But writers are artists, and like most artists we tend to think of ourselves as outcasts. The label is twofold; our creativity and panjandrum is admired, and our variance from normal nine-to-fives is frowned upon. But the mistake is buying into the outcast label, even cherishing it. Doing so separates us from our audience, making us bitter, and even worse, possibly leading to an aloof, chastising tone few enjoy reading.</p></blockquote>
<p><a class="noeffect" onClick="popWin(this.href);return false" href="http://agingink.com/files/2010/01/the-inklings.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-82" src="http://agingink.com/files/2010/01/the-inklings-150x150.jpg" alt="the-inklings" title="the-inklings" width="150" height="150" /></a> </p>
<p>Interesting contemplation thread that has me thinking about how writers might keep the reclusive tendencies at bay and opt for socialization. In the right circumstances, this would encourage the craft as it has done for other groups of writers in the past. Hence the photos. The upper one is of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beat_Generation#Writers" title="Wikipedia: Beat Generation Writers">the Beat writers</a>, clockwise from left: Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg, Peter Orlovsky, Lafcadio Orlovsky, and Gregory Corso in 1956. The lower photo is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inklings" title="Wikipedia: Inklings">the Inklings</a>, clockwise from left: J.R.R. Tolkein, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Owen Barfield. Of course, it&#8217;d be lovely to slip down to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eagle_and_Child" title="Wikipedia: The Eagle and Child">The Eagle and Child</a> every Tuesday evening, but I must have misplaced my invitation. Or perhaps it expired sixty years ago. Either way, I suppose a writer needs an alternative these days.</p>
<p>Sometimes I&#8217;ll go be a camper at some local coffee house with my laptop&#8230; at least that&#8217;s out in public, even if it&#8217;s still dining (and working) alone. Keeps me from going completely stir-crazy, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite what the aforelinked article had in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/writing-sans-solitude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 10 Best Books for Writers</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2010/the-10-best-books-for-writers/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2010/the-10-best-books-for-writers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 Best Books for Writers: a compilation of &#8220;the classics&#8221;, for writers, by writers, on writing.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://editorunleashed.com/2009/04/08/the-10-best-books-for-writers/">The 10 Best Books for Writers</a>: a compilation of &#8220;the classics&#8221;, for writers, by writers, on writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2010/the-10-best-books-for-writers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Publishing Person Self-Publishes</title>
		<link>http://agingink.com/2009/a-publishing-person-self-publishes/</link>
		<comments>http://agingink.com/2009/a-publishing-person-self-publishes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Toderash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agingink.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ There&#8217;s an interesting post at Self-Publishing Review, where someone from the publishing industry gives his own reasons for self-publishing.
I’ve always been a publishing person, from the time I spent studying copyright pages in books around age 8 to creating what still look like sophisticated magazines as an adolescent using only a typewriter, pen and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://agingink.com/files/2009/11/benfranklin_printer-150x141.jpg" alt="benfranklin_printer" title="benfranklin_printer" width="150" height="141" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-67" /> There&#8217;s an interesting <a href="http://www.selfpublishingreview.com/2009/05/04/guest-post-a-publishing-person-self-publishes/#comment-4990" title="Guest Post: A Publishing Person Self-Publishes | Self-Publishing Review">post at <em>Self-Publishing Review</em></a>, where someone from the publishing industry gives his own reasons for self-publishing.</p>
<blockquote><p>I’ve always been a publishing person, from the time I spent studying copyright pages in books around age 8 to creating what still look like sophisticated magazines as an adolescent using only a typewriter, pen and ink drawings, and Scotch tape, then photocopying the resulting layouts. I’ve worked in bookstores, typeset professionally, written for newspapers, compiled indexes (or indices if you so prefer), launched titles, designed and created reference works, redesigned magazines and journals, created web sites, and done a myriad other things in the realm of publishing.</p>
<p>And now, I’ve self-published my first novel.</p>
<p>I didn’t self-publish because the publishing process confuses, baffles, or overwhelms me. I don’t need a publisher to figure out discounting, rights retention, royalties, or the mechanics of publishing. I did it precisely because I understand the traditional publishing process, and I didn’t want it or need it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some good insight here into what most people tend to think is a straightforward decision &#8212; though it clearly isn&#8217;t. The discussion that follows gets lively and offers some further insight into the question of whether to self-publish or seek out an agent or publishing contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agingink.com/2009/a-publishing-person-self-publishes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

